Warren Ellis' Social Network Bullshit Machine
Posted on August 22nd, 2007 at 11:27am —
No Comments (Add)
Posted on August 20th, 2007 at 11:45pm —
4 Comments
(Add)
Posted on August 16th, 2007 at 2:56pm —
No Comments (Add)
Posted on August 15th, 2007 at 7:24pm —
3 Comments
(Add)
Posted on August 15th, 2007 at 6:17am —
2 Comments
(Add)
Warren Ellis
created this social network on Ning.
Book chewers!!!
(3 members)
Coffee Achievers
(6 members)
Star Wars Combine
(1 member)
Spread the word. Get your own The Club of Mars badge for your website or MySpace page. (Get Code)
© 2008 Created by Warren Ellis on Ning. Create your own social network
Comment Wall (6 comments)
You need to be a member of The Club of Mars to add comments!
Join this network
Which is supposed to be an analysis of the arguments against same sex marriage.
My hold up has been that I've been working on it too long and over thinking it... I've been so caught up in finding an artifact that is comprehensive in that I lost site of what is actually THERE. I suppose I wanted to be able to show that there IS such thing as a secular argument that holds up to logical testing. (Because I can't believe that _everyone _ who is against same sex marriage is religious zelot bent on disolving the wall between church and state. I've found other reasons for why non religious people would be opposed to this, but none that hold up to logic in a secular field of argument.)
If you are willing I'd love to discuss more, but via email.
So, in addition to several unforutnate events involving my family and my health that caused it to be put on hold for months at a clip, it's not done. Call it the worlds worst case of writers block.
Unfortunately, or perhaps fortunately, Finances and health dictate that it is time to move on to other things.
What that is, I have no idea yet.
As far as the 50cent video, a pre-survey to find a control group would be in order to find out HOW familiar your subjects are with the artist. One way to do this would be to have a few pictures of different hip-hop artists and ask them to identify each. Then watch the video without identifying who the video is by.
Having one group watch the video with the sound on and another with the sound off might be revealing. Have a group that isn't familiar with the artist just listen to the song without a video. Have another just read the lyrics to control for the nonverbal aspects of the communication. Given that aprox 70% of communication is nonverbal, AND that when in conflict, we tend to believe the nonverbal message over the verbal, I suspect each group would have different results, at least in terms of intensity of a reaction.
Of course, such a level of an experiment - at least to get significant reliable data - probably needs to happen in multiple regions, across multiple demographics. What would be best is to have a relativly unknown /up and comming artist to use for the experiment.
Anyway, just some ideas if you are looking to expand that study. Just think of me when you get a windfall of grant money to fund it. ;-)
One woman saw the needing of the father's approval and needing to disguise as a male as an example of patriarchal enforcement. The other woman saw the father's approval - later in the movie - as an example of a strong father-daughter bond in the context of family values. Further she cited that the need for the male characters - in order to save the day - to take on feminine traits was an example of the need to balance both masculine and feminine qualites.
All these parts taken together, I see that yet, there is still patriarchal influence (of course, the movie is set in a patriarchal time in a patriarchal culture), but in terms of a Disney production, it is a massive departure from the typical damsel in destress archetype. She doesn't end up marrying "prince chariming" and living happily ever after - instead, said prince comes to court her. There IS a message in there that a woman, in order to make her own way in life, needs to take on traits previously isolated to the realm of the masculine, however, more subtle is the message that men too can benifit from adding traits that were traditionally isolated to the realm of the feminine.
At least, that's how I see it. Isolating each piece of a puzzle works only in so far as how it fits into the entire puzzle. Which is, perhaps, why I grind my teeth when people take a piece of a message out of its greater context. News sound bytes are notorious for this. As are many people who toss around bible passages as if that was all the bible said about a given subject.
(Yeah, that was an actual argument two women got into about Mulan.)
Really, interpretation of a message is so tied into personal and cultural experiance, that I often wonder how we ever communicate anything clearly at all.
In other words, as a biologist disects a living thing, I pick apart messages.
Which is why your post on the rainmakers caught my interest.
And thank you for the answer. I knew I heard the phrase before. I just couldn't place where.